Forum

Share:
Notifications
Clear all

Difference between pi and pid controller

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
334 Views
Posts: 18022
Admin
Topic starter
(@click2electro)
Member
Joined: 3 years ago

Both PI and PID controllers are types of feedback controllers used in various automated systems to regulate a process variable (like temperature, pressure, or speed) to a desired setpoint.

Here's a breakdown of their functionalities and key differences:

Proportional (P) Controller:

  • The simplest form of feedback controller.
  • Continuously adjusts the output based on the proportional difference (error) between the current process variable and the desired setpoint.
  • Larger error results in a larger output adjustment to reduce the error.
  • Faster response to changes in the setpoint or disturbances.
  • Can lead to steady-state error (the process variable may not perfectly reach the setpoint).

Proportional-Integral (PI) Controller:

  • Combines proportional (P) action with integral (I) action.
  • P action addresses current error, while I action eliminates the steady-state error observed in P controllers.
  • The integral term essentially "remembers" the historical error and continuously adjusts the output to drive the process variable towards the setpoint.
  • Slower response compared to P controllers due to the averaging effect of the integral term.
  • Better at maintaining setpoint accuracy in processes with varying loads or disturbances.

PID Controller:

  • The most comprehensive form, combining proportional (P), integral (I), and derivative (D) actions.
  • P and I actions function similarly to a PI controller.
  • The derivative (D) term anticipates future changes in the error based on the rate of change of the error signal.
  • D action helps minimize overshoot (process variable exceeding the setpoint) and reduces settling time (time taken to reach and stabilize around the setpoint).
  • Generally offers the most precise control and minimizes both steady-state error and transient errors (overshoot and undershoot).
  • Tuning the P, I, and D gains (adjustable coefficients) of a PID controller requires more expertise compared to PI controllers.

Here's a table summarizing the key differences:

Feature Proportional (P) Controller Proportional Integral (PI) Controller PID Controller
Control Action P only P + I P + I + D
Response to Error Fast Slower than P Fastest
Steady-State Error May exist Eliminates Eliminates
Transient Errors Can have overshoot Can have overshoot
Minimizes overshoot and settling time
Tuning Complexity Simplest More complex than P Most complex
Suitability Simple processes Processes with varying loads or disturbances
Processes requiring high precision control

Choosing the Right Controller:

The choice between PI and PID controllers depends on the specific application and desired control performance.

1. PI controllers are a good choice for many industrial processes where steady-state accuracy is crucial and some transient error is acceptable.
2. PID controllers are preferred for applications demanding high precision control and minimal transient errors, even if the system dynamics are complex or have significant disturbances.

Here are some additional factors to consider:

1. Cost: PI controllers are generally less expensive to implement compared to PID controllers due to the simpler tuning process.
2. System Complexity: For very complex systems, a well-tuned PID controller might offer better performance compared to a PI controller.

Share: