Forum

Share:
Notifications
Clear all

What is MPI compared to PROFIBUS DP?

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
1,884 Views
Posts: 18455
Admin
Topic starter
(@click2electro)
Member
Joined: 4 years ago

MPI (Multi-Point Interface) and PROFIBUS DP (Decentralized Peripherals) are both communication protocols commonly used in industrial automation for connecting devices such as programmable logic controllers (PLCs), human-machine interfaces (HMIs), and distributed I/O modules. While they serve similar purposes, there are differences between MPI and PROFIBUS DP in terms of architecture, application, and functionality:

  1. Architecture:

    • MPI: MPI is a proprietary communication protocol developed by Siemens for communication between Siemens programmable logic controllers (PLCs) and other devices within a Siemens automation system. It is typically used for point-to-point communication or for connecting multiple devices in a small-scale automation network. MPI uses a master-slave communication model, where one device acts as the master (usually the PLC) and controls communication with multiple slave devices.
    • PROFIBUS DP: PROFIBUS DP is an open, standardized communication protocol developed by PROFIBUS International for communication between field devices, such as sensors, actuators, and controllers, in industrial automation systems. PROFIBUS DP is part of the PROFIBUS family of protocols and is widely used for high-speed, deterministic communication in large-scale automation networks. PROFIBUS DP supports both master-slave and peer-to-peer communication models.
  2. Topology:

    • MPI: MPI typically uses a point-to-point or multi-drop topology, where multiple devices are connected to a single communication line. The maximum number of devices that can be connected in an MPI network is limited by the electrical characteristics of the communication cable and the specific requirements of the devices involved.
    • PROFIBUS DP: PROFIBUS DP supports various network topologies, including line, tree, and star topologies. It uses a bus or trunk-and-spur architecture, where multiple devices are connected to a central bus or backbone. PROFIBUS DP networks can support larger numbers of devices compared to MPI networks, making them suitable for larger automation systems.
  3. Speed and Performance:

    • MPI: MPI communication typically operates at lower speeds compared to PROFIBUS DP, with maximum data rates ranging from 9.6 kbps to 12 Mbps, depending on the specific implementation and network configuration.
    • PROFIBUS DP: PROFIBUS DP supports higher data rates and faster communication speeds, with maximum data rates of up to 12 Mbps for PROFIBUS DP-V1 and up to 45 Mbps for PROFIBUS DP-V2. This high-speed communication capability makes PROFIBUS DP suitable for applications requiring fast and deterministic data exchange, such as motion control and process automation.
  4. Flexibility and Compatibility:

    • MPI: MPI is primarily designed for communication within Siemens automation systems and is mainly compatible with Siemens devices and software tools. While some third-party devices may support MPI communication, interoperability with non-Siemens devices may be limited.
    • PROFIBUS DP: PROFIBUS DP is an open, standardized protocol supported by a wide range of industrial automation vendors, allowing for interoperability between devices from different manufacturers. PROFIBUS DP devices are certified to comply with PROFIBUS International standards, ensuring compatibility and interoperability in multi-vendor environments.

In summary, while both MPI and PROFIBUS DP are communication protocols used in industrial automation, they differ in terms of architecture, topology, speed, performance, and compatibility. MPI is a proprietary protocol developed by Siemens for communication within Siemens automation systems, while PROFIBUS DP is an open, standardized protocol widely used for high-speed communication in large-scale industrial automation networks. The choice between MPI and PROFIBUS DP depends on factors such as network size, performance requirements, vendor preferences, and compatibility with existing automation systems.

Share: